Awr Hawkins
Breitbart.com
Big Government
24 Dec 2012
Chicago has been a shining city on a hill for gun-grabbers for decades. In fact, so extreme is the gun control in the Windy City that prior to the 2010 Supreme Court decision in McDonald v. Chicago, you couldn’t even have a gun in your own house with which to defend yourself or your family.
In other words, a Chicago home owner was like a public school teacher — he had to sit defenseless with his fingers crossed and simply hope the criminals didn’t target his house on a given day or night.
Even now, after the McDonald decision, you have jump through myriad hoops to get a gun. And, although they are working on it, concealed carry has yet to be legalized.
So in a gun-control-utopia such as this, you’d expect school-age children to be safe from all harm, if you buy into the theories of Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY).
Yet the truth is more than 440 school-age children have been shot in Chicago in 2012. This is not to say that 440 school-age children died, simply that more than 440 school-age children were at least wounded. The number of school-age children killed is reported at approximately 60.
These numbers are well above those for the 2011-2012 school year, in which 319 Chicago students were wounded and another 24 were killed.
The bottom line: It seems that denying the free exercise of the right to keep and bear arms to law-abiding citizens not only does not curtail the actions of criminals, but actually emboldens them.
Related: Intimidation: NY Newspaper Publishes Names, Addresses of Gun Permit Holders
Update: Ann Althouse writes about gun control and David Gregory’s interview with Wayne LaPierre:
…Gregory was all heated up, eager to extract his sound bites from LaPierre, in the typical style of recent gun control debates I’ve seen…
…It’s all about control: Do you think people are self-controlled or is government control needed?…
…The post-Newtown gun control advocates have been emphasizing the gun, rather than the person, on the theory that a person may have murderous impulses but if he doesn’t have a gun, he won’t be able to do as much damage. But in real life, if you had someone in you midst who was bent on murder, you would not think: Well, at least he doesn’t have a gun. If he goes off, what’s the worst he can do, maybe 4 or 5 kids, max?…
Read the whole thing at the link.
And remember Timothy McVeigh, in the deadliest act of terrorism in the U.S. prior to 9/11/2001, killed 168 people (including 19 children in a daycare center) and injured hundreds more with fertilizer and motor oil.
Update 2: Sauce for the goose or, home address and phone number of Journal-News publisher “I don’t know whether the Journal’s publisher Janet Hasson is a permit holder herself, but here’s how to find her to ask”
By the way, writes this blogger, Did the Journal-News break the law by posting gun permit holders’ names?
H/T Jim Treacher
