AMA journal article suggests mandating participation in experimental vaccine trials ‘for the greater good’

Ethan A. Huff
Natural News
1/20/2012

Some of the most deranged and sociopathic individuals on the planet hold respected positions of authority in medicine and at institutions of higher learning, and a recent journal article in the American Medical Association (AMA)’s Journal of Ethics serves as a reminder of this disturbing reality. In the article, two doctors from Oxford University in the UK advocate forcibly injecting individuals with experimental vaccines “for the greater good of society.”

PrisonPlanet.com reports that Oxford’s Susanne Sheehy, BM BCh, MRCP, DTM&H, and Joel Meyer, BM BCh, MRCP, together authored the paper, entitled Should Participation in Vaccine Clinical Trials be Mandated?. In it, the duo recommends “[c]ompulsory involvement in vaccine studies” in response to a general lack of willing volunteers, many of whom are not exactly comfortable sacrificing their bodies and their health to have a toxic brew of untested chemicals injected into them…

…Clearly stated in their paper, Sheehy and Meyer believe mandatory participation in vaccine trials is no different than requiring individuals to serve on jury duty, for instance, or to serve in the military. They also believe that forcing people to take experimental vaccines, even when such vaccines come with obvious “inherent risks,” is an individual’s required duty to give back to society.

Perhaps the most disturbing element of the paper, though, is its suggestion that “increas[ing] the severity” of diseases will help to facilitate “compulsory recruitment” into experimental vaccine trials…

Read the complete article at Natural News.

Related: Texas carpet-bombs 7,000 square miles with air-dropped rabies vaccines

Also, Obama says NO to WhiteHouse.gov petition to legalize raw milk at federal level

And, What We’re Learning about Obamacare isn’t Good — Especially for Seniors

…while we wait for the courts to rule on the constitutional issues involved, the Obama administration is rapidly implementing the program.  By the time the courts finally reach a decision, our healthcare system won’t resemble what we had prior to March 2010 when Nancy Pelosi used her oversized gavel to pound Obamacare through the House over strenuous objections from most Americans.

Our senior citizens are most at risk under Obamacare — especially those over 70.  Rationing of services and death panels (only they’re called “ethics panels” under Obamacare instead of death panels for obvious reasons) are now the rule, not the exception…

…If Obama is re-elected and Democrats retain their majority in the Senate, those “ethics panels” will busily go about doing their job and senior citizens will die prematurely from maladies that are easily treatable, and for one reason: they are over 70.  That’s it in a nutshell…

Comments are closed.