How are Obama and the IRS getting away with a blatant coverup?

Kyle Smith
The New York Post

…The thing about dogs eating homework is, it could actually happen. This can’t.

This is “the dog ate my hard drive, broke into another building, ate the backup of the hard drive, then broke into six other top officials’ offices and ate their hard drives also.”

What we learned about the IRS this week is that there is an obvious criminal coverup that comes in addition to the possible underlying crimes. Prosecutions need to be brought against all of those involved.

Why isn’t this happening already?…

…In Watergate, we were outraged that Nixon ordered the IRS to go after political foes — even though the IRS refused to do his bidding. A Nixon ally was forced to whine that the IRS was controlled by Democrats.

There was evidently little or no evidence that IRS power was abused, because the second Article of Impeachment against Nixon charged merely that he “endeavored” to sic the IRS on enemies.

In the Obama administration, on the other hand, we know that the IRS went after political foes. We don’t know whether the president was involved, but if Nixon’s IRS had targeted liberals because it believed it had an implicit go-ahead from the boss, wouldn’t that be fairly disturbing also? Would a breezy dismissal from Nixon make you feel better?…



Read the entire article at the NYPost.


Related: Woodward and Bernstein on IRS scandal: Neither press nor Democrats doing enough to get answers (video)

In this exchange on CNN, storied journalists Woodward and Bernstein say the press isn’t doing enough to get the real story, and neither are Democrats, who are just stonewalling…

Watch it at the link.



Comments are closed.