David A. Patten
Newsmax.com
31 March 2010
Major business groups want a provision of healthcare-reform repealed because it could cost American corporations up to $14 billion at a time when people desperately need jobs.
James A. Klein, president of the American Benefits Council, warns the same tax-law change that led AT&T to take a $1 billion charge last week represents “a serious mistake that is having negative and unintended consequences.”
On Wednesday, Boeing became the latest company to announce a write down of value due to healthcare reform, deducting $150 million from its first quarter earnings.
Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office, and the head of President George W. Bush’s council of economic advisers, tells Newsmax that the higher taxes incurred by AT&T and other corporations reflect the deep flaws in the healthcare reform measure, which he calls “a dreadful bill, one this country really can’t afford and shouldn’t have pursued.”
He adds that the tax changes will burden the American economy’s ability to create jobs.
“That money’s going to come out of the ability to invest in capital, the ability to hire new workers, the ability to do R & D — all the things that are at the heart of making the economy grow faster,” he says.
At the heart of the controversy are changes in subsidies first offered to businesses when the system to provide prescription drug benefits to seniors, known as Medicare Part D, was enacted in 2003.
Many major companies that already paid to provide prescription-drug benefits to their retirees would simply shift them onto Medicare Part D, disrupting seniors’ healthcare plans while increasing the costs of Medicare Part D…
…
Top News
* Vatican Blasts U.S. Sex Abuse Coverage
* NY Times Still Pays Obama’s Nominee to Army Post
* Democrats Lie Low After Healthcare Victory
* Offshore Atlantic Drilling Divides
* Podesta: Obama Must Stop Being ‘Prime Minister’
Sponsors
* Male Enhancement Exposed – Pilot Tells His Secret
* Save up to 75% – New Lower Rates on Term Life
* Better Libido Every Time With This Super Pill
* Secret Most Men Will Never Know About Self Defense
* Is Your Fish Oil Supplement Slowly Killing You?
* Generate Income Even If Obama Destroys the Economy
* How to sweep your arteries clear
* Reverse Mortgages a New Cash Option for Seniors
This little blue pill is amazing! Ladies love guys that take it.
You Can Reverse Heart Disease, Heart Doctor Says
Doctor: 3 Nutrients Stop Cholesterol, Artery Hardening
Warning on Vaccinations, Dangerous Side-Effects
Free Offer on Palin’s Best Selling Book. Click Here Now.
Home > Headline
Print Page | Forward Page | E-mail Us
Obamacare’s Prescription for Disaster: $14 Billion Cost to Industry
Wednesday, 31 Mar 2010 07:53 PM
Article Font Size
By: David A. Patten
Major business groups want a provision of healthcare-reform repealed because it could cost American corporations up to $14 billion at a time when people desperately need jobs.
James A. Klein, president of the American Benefits Council, warns the same tax-law change that led AT&T to take a $1 billion charge last week represents “a serious mistake that is having negative and unintended consequences.”
On Wednesday, Boeing became the latest company to announce a write down of value due to healthcare reform, deducting $150 million from its first quarter earnings.
Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office, and the head of President George W. Bush’s council of economic advisers, tells Newsmax that the higher taxes incurred by AT&T and other corporations reflect the deep flaws in the healthcare reform measure, which he calls “a dreadful bill, one this country really can’t afford and shouldn’t have pursued.”
He adds that the tax changes will burden the American economy’s ability to create jobs.
“That money’s going to come out of the ability to invest in capital, the ability to hire new workers, the ability to do R & D — all the things that are at the heart of making the economy grow faster,” he says.
At the heart of the controversy are changes in subsidies first offered to businesses when the system to provide prescription drug benefits to seniors, known as Medicare Part D, was enacted in 2003.
Many major companies that already paid to provide prescription-drug benefits to their retirees would simply shift them onto Medicare Part D, disrupting seniors’ healthcare plans while increasing the costs of Medicare Part D.
To encourage businesses to keep the retirees on the corporate plans, two incentives were offered: The corporations would receive a federal subsidy of $1,330 per retiree, and they would be able to deduct the value of the subsidy from their corporate tax bills.
Congressional Democrats and White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs have referred to the double incentive as a “tax loophole.” Not so, according to Holtz-Eakin, who says Congress “carefully calibrated” the precise, smallest subsidy necessary to keep companies from cancelling prescription-drug coverage from retirees’ plans.
The healthcare plan signed by President Obama changes that structure, however, continuing the subsidy while ending the tax deductibility of the program costs. The change affects the profitability of a wide range of companies struggling to remain competitive in a tough economy.
In addition to AT&T’s whopping $1 billion write-off in value and Boeing’s $150 million, the other companies taking charges read like a Who’s Who of American industry:
• Deere & Company – $150 million
• Caterpillar – $100 million
• 3 M – $90 million
• Goodrich – $10 million
• Valero – $15-$20 million
• AK Steel – $31 million
In addition, telecommunications giant Verizon has sent a letter to employees warning that their healthcare plans may change as a result of healthcare reform…
…The announcements by the corporations — who were complying with SEC-enforced accounting rules that require sharing of information on the objective value of their corporations — has set off quick retaliation by Democrats.
House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman declared the write-downs appear to “conflict with independent analyses.”
He ordered the CEO’s of major corporations to defend their write-offs during congressional hearings next month, asking them to provide “any analyses” that the companies had conducted on healthcare costs, “including e-mail messages, sent to or prepared or reviewed by senior company officials related to the projected impact of health care reform…”
House Minority Leader John Boehner shot back: “Instead of interrogating America’s private-sector job creators, Congress should be listening to them, heeding their warnings about the effects of this deeply flawed new law, and replacing it with reforms that will help them get back to creating jobs.”
Megan McArdle, business and economics editor for The Atlantic, wrote Tuesday that a failure to announce a reduction in company value would amount to misleading investors.
“Obviously, Waxman is incensed because this seems to put the lie to the promise that if you like your current plan, nothing will change,” she wrote.
“But this was never true. Medicare Advantage beneficiaries are basically going to see their generous benefits slashed, retiree drug benefits suddenly cost more and may now be discontinued, and ultimately, more than a few employers will almost certainly find it cheaper to shut down their plans.
“If Congress didn’t want those things to happen, it should have passed a different law,” McArdle concluded…
Read the entire article at Newsmax.com
