…. This and more in Random Furballs for a Sunday Morning
Blazing Cat Fur
9/5/2010
“No feeling of guilt?” asked Kroft.
“No,” said Soros. “There was no sense that I shouldn’t be there. If I wasn’t doing it, somebody else would be taking it away anyhow. Whether I was there or not. So I had no sense of guilt.”
A Nazi would steal the Jews’ property anyways. So why not him? [CAJ note: A must-read link to Ezra Levant’s post, “George Schwartz, the Jewish Nazi”]
Blazing Cat Fur and readers exchange excellent comments about Soros, Islam, the Ground Zero mega-mosque, and the Canadian media at this link.
* * * * * * *
Update: From Michelle Malkin, “George Soros showers $100 millon on Human Rights Watch”
…Mr. Soros put it differently. “I’m afraid the United States has lost the moral high ground under the Bush administration, but the principles that Human Rights Watch promotes have not lost their universal applicability,” he said. “So to be more effective, I think the organization has to be seen as more international, less an American organization.”
The anti-Israel bias of HRW is so brazen that liberal lawyer Alan Dershowitz took to the blogosphere to denounce it:
“Who will guard the guardians?” asked Roman satirist Juvenal. Now we must ask, who is watching Human Rights Watch, one of the world’s best-financed and most influential human rights organizations? It turns out that they cook the books about facts, cheat on interviews, and put out pre-determined conclusions that are driven more by their ideology than by evidence. These are serious accusations, and they are demonstrably true.
…Many former supporters of Human Rights Watch have become alienated from the organization, because of, in the words of one early supporter, “their obsessive focus on Israel.” Within the last month, virtually every component of the organized Jewish community, from secular to religious, liberal to conservative, has condemned Human Rights Watch for its bias…
