A Deep Dive Into The Employment Numbers Show They’re A Lot Weaker Than You Think

Comstock Partners
Business Insider

The headline numbers for changes in non-farm payroll employment are significantly overstated according to our examination of the data in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) website. This occurs as a result of the distorting effects of two factors—- seasonal adjustments over a year’s time and the annual benchmark revisions that correct earlier incomplete data.

Let’s deal with the seasonal adjustment distortion first. The recently released employment number for October indicates that seasonally adjusted jobs increased by 829,000 over October 2009. However, BLS data show that non-seasonally adjusted employment increased only 626,000 over the same period. Since normal seasonal fluctuations are not a factor when comparing any number to a year-earlier period, monthly seasonal adjustments in this case are overstating the change in employment by 203,000. In other words, the actual increase in employment for the 12 months ending October is 203,000 less than the total you would get by adding up the last 12 months of the seasonally-adjusted data that everyone uses.

The second distorting factor is the annual benchmark revision, which the BLS estimates at this time each year. In line with this routine practice the Bureau recently announced an estimated downward adjustment to March 2010 nonfarm employment of 366,000. This essentially wipes out more than the entire birth/death adjustment for the period of 336,000. This will be the second consecutive year in which the benchmark revision more than wiped out the additional jobs added by the birth/death adjustment. The final benchmark revision will be issued with the employment report to be released on February 4, 2011.

The article continues at Business Insider.

Comments are closed.